|
Apiguard Richard Ball's Figures |
DIARY of an APIGUARD TREATMENT |
|---|
Apiguard treatment, a diary of testing, results recorded from tests and treatments performed by Ruary Rudd during Autumn 2005 in Co. Kerry, Ireland.
|
DIARY of an APIGUARD TREATMENT
Ruary Rudd On the 7th September 2003, I discovered that Varroa had reached my colonies, by using a 48-hour test with Bayvarol. I found two mites in one colony. Testing the other colonies found no mite fall. In view of the low numbers detected I did not treat any of the colonies that winter. All my colonies were on open mesh floors with no insert throughout the year except when monitoring was taking place. The next March (2004) testing for a natural mite drop over three days showed a zero mite fall and so no treatment was called for at that stage. In the Autumn of 2004, I treated all the colonies with Bayvarol. The strips were inserted on the 17th August and monitoring boards were checked 48 hours after. The heaviest mite drop was only 26 mites. The strips were kept in for the full period and were removed on the 28th September. In March 2005, I checked natural mite drop in four of my colonies from the 19th to the 24th and got the following results:-
Another check in July gave results which, using Richard Ball's figures, [Menu top left] were on the limits between no control and light control. I decided to 'let thing lie' as my colonies were still on Open Mesh floors with no inserts; and that I would treat in the autumn. I would use Apiguard to rotate treatment regimes so as to help delay the onset of 'resistant mites'. After reading Gerry Murphy's article in the GBBG newsletter The Four Seasons, I made the 20 mm ekes and I inserted the thymol gel on the 28th August. I monitored only one hive, colony #1.
This showed that there was trend of increasing mite fall which after the 6th September changed to a trend of declining numbers.
At this stage, although the daily mite drop was showing alarming fluctuations, the moving average was flattening out at about 3 per day, if the Apiguard was working this would have to come down to less than 0.4 or even zero. As the 24th September was the first day with a zero mite drop This average was feasible. The Monitoring was continued for the remaining period of treatment.
This concluded the treatment period. The hives in the apiary were opened, cover boards and ekes removed, the cover boards and tops of the frames scraped to allow the cover board to fit back tightly. All inserts were removed and cleaned except for the monitored hive which had the insert replaced so that monitoring could continue. Any gel remaining on the colonies was removed and collected in a plastic bag. The total weight was 3 1/2 Oz. One colony had cleaned it all, but there was remaining gel on all the other trays.
Looking at these results I had a mite fall of two in 15 days at the end of, and just after the treatment period. According to Richard Ball's figures this figure is 15 times less than needed to call for any treatment. I intend to monitor in November and then in March to determine future treatment regimes. Further monitoring was done in early December: 6 colonies had greased insert installed... A check was done after 10 days. and inserts renewed.
There was no reason for any of the colonies to receive any further treatment that winter, and certainly no need for a treatment with Oxalic Acid. In accordance with the I.P.M regime, monitoring would take place in March of 2006.
COMMENTS
All in all very satisfactory and these results show that Apiguard works and that there is no need for an automatic follow up treatment with oxalic acid in mid winter. Ruary Rudd |
Original by Ruary... Spring 2006, This Page... Mid March 2007, Layout Adjusted... 27 March 2007, Addition... 02 April 2007,
|